
Ask Bonnie
August 2007
Instant nutritional support with
Nutritional Concepts Action Plans!
Question #1:
How am I to interpret the vast quantity of health research
that comes out on a weekly basis?
Answer #1:
Matt Brignall, a Naturopathic Doctor, wrote a wonderful piece about this issue.
"Perhaps the biggest difficulty in interpretation is that studies of unconventional approaches are almost uniformly of lower quality than studies
in modern surgery or pharmacology. This lower quality is generally more a function of resource limitations than any intent, and is reflected in
smaller numbers of subjects, problems with randomization or blinding of studies, or difficult to measure outcomes.
Still, lower quality research is still science, and is important in advancing our knowledge, as long as our interpretations are valid. Here are the
different levels of research study, and some idea of the level of evidence they represent:
- Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: Usually the highest standard of research study. Here, researchers can
demonstrate cause and effect most clearly. Even though this method can yield flawed results, this level of research is often sufficient to make a
conclusion about a new treatment.
- Unblinded clinical trial: Here, subjects in the study get a treatment, but they may not be compared to a similar group
not receiving treatment, and are aware of the treatment they are getting. While this type of study is not definitive, it can help to identify
potentially useful treatments worthy of further study.
- Epidemiology or survey study: These are studies that survey a large group of people and attempt to find correlations
between disease and health habits. These studies do not demonstrate cause and effect, but when they yield consistent results, can still sway medical
opinion. Much of what doctors know about diet and exercise comes from this type of research.
- Anecdote or case report: These describe the outcome of a single patient after a specific intervention. While patients
and consumers often find this level of evidence compelling, I do not. Published case reports go through a peer-review process, which makes them more
credible than other anecdotes. Interesting and important treatments often are first reported as a single case, but further research is virtually
always necessary to confirm results.
- Preclinical research: Animal and test-tube studies help to show the mechanisms by which treatments may work. They
should not be the basis for general health recommendations, but when results are consistent with higher level studies, they can help to fill in
knowledge gaps.
- Meta-analysis: As their name suggests, this type of study gather together multiple research studies, sometimes of
different levels of evidence. A meta-analysis is only as good as the studies analyzed, but can often highlight bias inherent in individual research
studies.
Complicated and subtle interventions like diet and lifestyle changes are simultaneously thought to be some of the most
important predictors of human health outcomes, and among the most difficult treatments to effectively study. For this reason, diet and lifestyle
recommendations are often made based on the results of survey research, supported by consistent animal and test-tube findings. If you have been
puzzled by how frequently healthy diet recommendations seem to change, this lower level of evidence may help to explain the inconsistency.
There are several questions I tend to ask about new treatments before I consider bringing them into my clinical practice. Here are a few:
- Has the safety of the intervention been properly demonstrated in human beings (not just animals)?
- What level of research is there to demonstrate efficacy?
- Are the conclusions of the researchers plausible? Do they overreach?
- Is this new treatment option equivalent to or better than other available treatments?"
I couldn't have said it better myself!
Have a happy, healthy day.
Past Ask Bonnie entries:
1999 June,
July,
Aug,
Sept,
Oct,
Nov,
Dec
2000 Jan,
Feb,
Mar,
Apr,
May,
June,
July,
Aug,
Sept,
Oct,
Nov,
Dec
2001 Jan,
Feb, Mar, Apr, May, June,
July,
Aug,
Sept,
Oct,
Nov,
Dec
2002 Feb, Mar,
Apr,
May,
June,
July,
Aug,
Sept,
Oct,
Nov,
Dec
2003 Jan,
Feb,
Mar,
Apr,
May,
June,
July,
Sept,
Oct,
Nov,
Dec
2004 Jan,
Feb,
Mar,
Apr, May, June, July, Aug, Sept, Oct, Nov/Dec
2005 Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, June, July, Aug, Sept, Oct, Nov, Dec
2006 Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, June, July, Aug, Sept, Oct, Nov, Dec
2007 Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, June, July
Would like your question to be considered for Ask Bonnie?
Please email us at support@nutritionalconcepts.com and see if it appears next month!
ASK BONNIE appears each month on http://www.nutritionalconcepts.com
© Copyright 1985-2007 Nutritional Concepts, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of any page on this website in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Disclaimer: The information
contained on this website is not intended as a substitute for medical advice nor is intended to diagnose, cure, mitigate, or treat any disease. For
health problems relating to individual needs, consult your physician before adopting any suggestions made by the website.